With the All-Star balloting in full swing, a salient thought spontaneously popped into my head: Bad baseball fans don't cast All-Star votes. Good baseball fans vote as much as they are allowed to (or more), filling out the entire ballot with members of their team. Great fans, however, vote for the best and most deserving players, regardless of the team.
I would like to use "broken" to describe the state of all-star player selection, but two things stop me. First of all, it seems a trifle dramatic to decry a system that works more often than it does not in a field that does not really matter so much. Second of all, the flaw of the current system is that it allows fanatical fans of a particular team to flood the books with votes and send their players to the midsummer classic, even if they do not deserve it. And no fan base is more fanatical than that of my beloved Giants, as is clearly evident by last year's ballot totals.
While Buster Posey and Melky Cabrera both deserved and received a starting position in the All-Star Game (at least we thought so before we learned Melky had taken performance enhancing drugs), Pablo Sandoval garnered 5,743,524 votes, surpassing David Wright's 4,133,380, despite the latter's arguably superior numbers.
Perhaps far more outrageous were the Giants that did not win starting spots, but came close even if they had no business doing so. Look no further then Freddy Sanchez. How many times did someone cast a ballot claiming that Freddy Sanchez was the best second baseman in the National League in 2012? 2,289,147 times. How many many games did he play in 2012? Zero games. He spent the whole year on the disabled list, and garnered more votes than all but three other second baseman. He got more votes than Rickie Weeks, Chase Utley, and Omar Infante; even though they were all more deserving. I think you could make the argument that Jimmy Rollins, who played one game at second, was more deserving than freddy sanchez in 2012. Brandon Belt, Brandon Crawford, Angel Pagan, and Aubrey Huff all were similarly endowed with a flood of votes despite not deserving them.
Its unfair, but unfair in our favor, and who would complain at that? But when I had my epiphany about how great fans don't just vote for their favorite team's lineup regardless of merit, I realized that if I was to claim to be a great baseball fan, I would have to criticize the current system, even if, or perhaps especially because, it gives the Giants an unfair advantage.
Finding a good way to fix the system is difficult. Ending fan balloting would cause an uproar. Restricting a fan's ability to vote for members of his own team by one way or another would perhaps end mindless favoritism but would only favor big-money teams with many fans in other zip codes. So here is my propsal on how to reform the All-star voting system: Learn from the US electoral college, in which electoral voters are "obligated", but not absolutely required, to cast ballots for the candidate their jurisdiction most supported. The fan vote will be presented to a group that has the power to change some parts of it. Since it is not one person, there would be little favoritism. My suggested would be a small roundtable of a few managers, coaches, umpires, and writers (to pick the best players from an on-the-field point of view) and a few front-office types and league staff (to make sure the All-Star lineup is good from a marketing/PR point of view).
Maybe, just maybe, fans would see that voting for their favorite players regardless of the numbers would be futile in this scenario, and would start casting ballots for those that deserve it.